We have talked in the past of the Holy Braille of the female body, the G Spot, and how surgeons are trying to increase the prominence of the point to enhance sexual pleasure for the female. Now, my old and royal leaders, loyal readers know how much I care for female empowerment.
Ladies and more ladies, there are many potentially path-breaking developments in the evolution of female sexuality. I am just wondering how long science is going to take to help women reach the present glow of sexual tightness lightness in which I find myself most of the time.
A point of grammatical digression, is the state of being lit by light ‘lightness’ or ‘light’ (apart from ‘enlightenment’)? Anyways.
As many of you do know, most women don’t manage to reach orgasms because the guys are too busy trying to finish off things to catch the next Tube homewards, or because the female system requirements are overwhelming the male hardware specs, akin to a Vista installation in an XP machine. Man, too much upgradation required, ain’t it?
There is hope, short of dumping the guy and getting a proper stud to right things for you.
A stimulator, for one.
Huh? No, I am not talking of vibrators and sex toys, because I am an Indian, and neither my culture, nor my country’s laws, permit me to use such things. Besides, I am a guy whose fingers vibrate, a sort of premature Parkinson’s disease.
A spinal nerve stimulator is a device like a pack of cigarettes, implanted under the skin of the buttock (how imaginative!), that stimulates the nerves of the spinal cord. This is used to treat chronic back pain, and was found to lead to female orgasms.
Female orgasm is a phenomenon as rare as a Rainbow Of Fire, but less so than mutual orgasms and multiple orgasms, which are more often found in colorful scatologic accounts than in reality.
The sexual anatomy of the female is still now, in this modern day and age, controversial, as is the concept of female sexuality. Sample some of these:
1. Is the clitoris a magic button?
Er, no. It seems it is much bigger than previously described. From the descriptions of sexologists, I imagined it to be extending up to the back part of the tongue, but actually it seems to extend up to the G spot.
2. Is there a G spot?
Yes and no. There is no single, tiny pinhead, but the G spot, which is described as a point in the front wall of the vagina, between 11 and 1 o’clock (now don’t ask if it is AM or PM), seems to be linked with pelvic nerves, and hence the erogenous area is more extensive than thought to be. Men should heave a sigh of relief, as they don’t need to be wizards at G-spot mapping, and trouble their women even more by their hopeful and hopeless explorations.
3. If a male ejaculates, what does a female do?
Some females also do so. There is a urethral fluid, around 2 to 5 ml, that comes out, especially in the female on top position.
4. What is the source of a female orgasm: the clitoris, the vagina, or the G spot?
A lot of sources, with plenty of variations in individuals. While the orgasm in the male is linear, in the female it is more circular, or non-linear. Check out this highly readable article by Germaine Greer.
So, what aids adjuncts do women have to enhance or actuate their own orgasms?
I quote from an article:
Eros: approved 2000 by FDA—a clitoral suction device that increases blood flow and lubrication is out on the market.
Intrinsa: testosterone patch from P&G (refused FDA approval until more long term research is done) but looks very promising in clinical trials.
PT-141: nasal spray to increase blood flow and arousal by targeting the CNS (melanocortin agonist) not out yet.
LibiGe: testosterone gel Phase III clinical trials.
EstraVil: non-prescription herbal remedy that makes some pretty outlandish claims. This has NOT had to go through FDA approval or testing.
All these are in addition to the Rabbit vibrator, which Greer endorses.
So, no more need to tolerate messophilic, tooth-picking, serially eructating exhibitionists just for that one anniversarial orgasmic tickle.
Get a stimulator, or something else, and get your man laid off!
A NEW FREEDOM FOR THE FUTURE
There is a
bombgirl who frequents the same gym I go to. She looks like a movie star, and works ferociously at the various sculpting machines there. She keeps looking back at an imaginary fold of fat at the waist, and keeps whining to the trainer, “I am putting on weight!”This beauty is spending money, time and effort to beat a non-existent disease: obesity. She is also, potentially, damaging her joints and heart when she pounds the treadmills and pumps the weights. Shouldn’t someone stop her before its too late?
There is another girl I know who wants to trim her inner labia. She seeks a cosmetic gynecologist who does vaginoplasties. And another one who wants a surgery to make her a virgin again, before she gets married a few weeks later. These girls are looking to seek potentially dangerous and complication-prone operations that treat no disease. They are merely expressing some inner wish to change their structure, though there may be nothing fundamentally wrong with them.
I had previously highlighted how the American College of Gynecologists (ACOG) is hotly after the man who has made vaginoplasty a commercial money-spinner. This merely illustrates the fact that there are people in the world, including medical experts, who want to stop procedures that alter one’s physical state. Sex change surgery is another example. There are countries where this is illegal.
The future is fraught with potentially more complex and controversial issues like using genetic engineering and cloning to create a new type of human being that may be peculiarly enhanced. For example, a mother may be able to select a baby who is genetically engineered to see in the dark. Or one who will be free of certain deadly diseases. If you have not read my article on ‘Disruptive Medicine’, this is your lucky day. Check it out.
A Swedish organisation called Eudoxa talks of this morphological freedom, defining it as “an extended right to your own life, including your body.”
Why would a man or woman want to alter his structure for overtly trivial reasons?
Look at tattooing. The way many conservative people see it, it is a kinky and perverse thing to do. It is, however, considered quite cool and contemporary by much of modern society.
It is a personal morphological alteration without specific reasons beyond an individual’s personal choice and freedom of expression.
But wouldn’t genetic modification of children alter society and endanger it? Should we not stop this before it is too late?
In other words, apart from the issues of personal freedom and choice, these same disruptive technologies that could change future generations could also save countless lives and improve the lifestyle of the suffering. For example, see the use of intelligent prostheses for amputees that work better than normal limbs.
For more details, check out this link and download a pdf of the statement of Eudoxa.
Whatever be one’s views on this, this issue is a sure one for the future. You haven’t heard anything yet!
27 Comments
Posted in business, commentary, culture, design, future, gynecology, health, life, medicine, medicolegal, news, politics, rights, science, second opinion, society, surgery, technology, vaginoplasty, women's rights, world